<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 81 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221314</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the petitions by directing the parties to resolve disputes over service tax applicability and liability through arbitration and intervention in appeal proceedings. Interim arrangements were outlined to safeguard parties&#039; interests regarding recovered service tax, security deposits, and outstanding demands until final determinations were made. The court emphasized the importance of utilizing legal channels to address the disputes effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2014 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 81 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221314</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the petitions by directing the parties to resolve disputes over service tax applicability and liability through arbitration and intervention in appeal proceedings. Interim arrangements were outlined to safeguard parties&#039; interests regarding recovered service tax, security deposits, and outstanding demands until final determinations were made. The court emphasized the importance of utilizing legal channels to address the disputes effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>