<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 42 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221275</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit was found admissible on rent-a-cab service used to transport employees to and from the factory and on air travel agency service used by officials for procurement and marketing-related work. The services were treated as input services because they were used in or in relation to manufacture and fell within activities relating to business, with a sufficient nexus to company operations such as coordination with railways and vendors. They were not shown to be mere employee perquisites, and the Revenue failed to dislodge the Commissioner&#039;s factual finding. The challenge therefore failed, and the respondent retained the credit benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 42 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221275</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit was found admissible on rent-a-cab service used to transport employees to and from the factory and on air travel agency service used by officials for procurement and marketing-related work. The services were treated as input services because they were used in or in relation to manufacture and fell within activities relating to business, with a sufficient nexus to company operations such as coordination with railways and vendors. They were not shown to be mere employee perquisites, and the Revenue failed to dislodge the Commissioner&#039;s factual finding. The challenge therefore failed, and the respondent retained the credit benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>