<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 34 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221267</link>
    <description>The Court held that section 264(6) of the Income Tax Act is directory, not mandatory. The Commissioner of Income Tax was directed to decide the revision application within three months from the Court&#039;s order to expedite the process. The decision aimed to prevent delays and ensure justice for all parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 34 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221267</link>
      <description>The Court held that section 264(6) of the Income Tax Act is directory, not mandatory. The Commissioner of Income Tax was directed to decide the revision application within three months from the Court&#039;s order to expedite the process. The decision aimed to prevent delays and ensure justice for all parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>