<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 31 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221264</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the validity of the protective assessment made by the Assessing Officer in the absence of identifying the real owner of the income. The Court emphasized the Assessing Authority&#039;s right to resort to protective assessment in cases of uncertainty, especially when doubt exists regarding the genuineness of the claim. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat the assessment as substantive was overturned, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 19:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 31 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221264</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the validity of the protective assessment made by the Assessing Officer in the absence of identifying the real owner of the income. The Court emphasized the Assessing Authority&#039;s right to resort to protective assessment in cases of uncertainty, especially when doubt exists regarding the genuineness of the claim. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat the assessment as substantive was overturned, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>