<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 27 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221260</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Original, confirming the demand for excise duty and the imposition of an equivalent penalty on the Appellant. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the DLTEE System was an excisable good, movable and marketable, and its value was correctly determined for excise duty purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 27 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221260</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Original, confirming the demand for excise duty and the imposition of an equivalent penalty on the Appellant. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the DLTEE System was an excisable good, movable and marketable, and its value was correctly determined for excise duty purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>