<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 26 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221259</link>
    <description>An appellate order dismissing an appeal for non-compliance with pre-deposit could not be sustained where the appellant had already paid the service tax and interest and was not given an effective opportunity of hearing. The matter was required to be reconsidered on merits without insisting on pre-deposit, and with a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The impugned order was set aside and the case remanded for fresh decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 07:27:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 26 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221259</link>
      <description>An appellate order dismissing an appeal for non-compliance with pre-deposit could not be sustained where the appellant had already paid the service tax and interest and was not given an effective opportunity of hearing. The matter was required to be reconsidered on merits without insisting on pre-deposit, and with a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The impugned order was set aside and the case remanded for fresh decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>