<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 23 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221256</link>
    <description>A reassessment order under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act was found unsustainable where the assessee had sought time to file a reply, but the authority completed the assessment the next day without communicating any rejection of that request or giving an opportunity of hearing. The court treated the denial of a chance to respond as a material procedural defect and quashed the reassessment order. The assessee was allowed to file a reply within the time granted, and fresh orders were directed to be passed thereafter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 10:18:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 23 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221256</link>
      <description>A reassessment order under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act was found unsustainable where the assessee had sought time to file a reply, but the authority completed the assessment the next day without communicating any rejection of that request or giving an opportunity of hearing. The court treated the denial of a chance to respond as a material procedural defect and quashed the reassessment order. The assessee was allowed to file a reply within the time granted, and fresh orders were directed to be passed thereafter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>