https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221239 The Court quashed orders for recovery of customs duty with interest issued by the Joint Director General of Foreign Trade, finding that the notices only mentioned penalties under Section 11(2) of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, not customs duty recovery. The Court held that the Act does not grant authority for customs duty recovery by the Joint DGFT, which falls under customs authorities' jurisdiction. The ruling did not address the broader issue of the Joint DGFT's authority to recover customs duty, leaving open the possibility for lawful recovery through appropriate channels. en-us Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Mar 2013 10:17:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221239 The Court quashed orders for recovery of customs duty with interest issued by the Joint Director General of Foreign Trade, finding that the notices only mentioned penalties under Section 11(2) of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, not customs duty recovery. The Court held that the Act does not grant authority for customs duty recovery by the Joint DGFT, which falls under customs authorities' jurisdiction. The ruling did not address the broader issue of the Joint DGFT's authority to recover customs duty, leaving open the possibility for lawful recovery through appropriate channels. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221239