<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 3 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221236</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 3,00,000 within eight weeks, with the remaining dues waived and recovery stayed during the appeal&#039;s pendency. The Tribunal found that despite the rules being considered ultra vires, the liability to pay duty under Section 3 of the Central Excise Act remained. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s failure to pay duty on cleared goods, leading to the conclusion that a total waiver of duty was not warranted in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 10:16:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 3 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221236</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 3,00,000 within eight weeks, with the remaining dues waived and recovery stayed during the appeal&#039;s pendency. The Tribunal found that despite the rules being considered ultra vires, the liability to pay duty under Section 3 of the Central Excise Act remained. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s failure to pay duty on cleared goods, leading to the conclusion that a total waiver of duty was not warranted in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>