<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 2 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221235</link>
    <description>Basic excise duty was held usable for discharging education cess for the relevant period, where the Tribunal followed an identical issue already decided in the assessee&#039;s own case and upheld by the High Court. On that settled position, the impugned order could not be sustained, and the issue was resolved in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 10:16:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 2 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221235</link>
      <description>Basic excise duty was held usable for discharging education cess for the relevant period, where the Tribunal followed an identical issue already decided in the assessee&#039;s own case and upheld by the High Court. On that settled position, the impugned order could not be sustained, and the issue was resolved in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>