<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 1 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221234</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on duty-paid inputs cannot be denied merely because it was not availed immediately on receipt, where the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 do not prescribe a specific time limit for availment. The term &quot;immediately&quot; under Rule 4(1) was read as requiring credit to be taken at the earliest practical point after receipt, not as making delayed availment fatal to entitlement. Where the inputs are received in the factory and used in or in relation to manufacture of dutiable final products, delayed credit by itself does not prejudice Revenue. On that basis, denial of credit and consequential penalties were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 10:16:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 1 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221234</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on duty-paid inputs cannot be denied merely because it was not availed immediately on receipt, where the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 do not prescribe a specific time limit for availment. The term &quot;immediately&quot; under Rule 4(1) was read as requiring credit to be taken at the earliest practical point after receipt, not as making delayed availment fatal to entitlement. Where the inputs are received in the factory and used in or in relation to manufacture of dutiable final products, delayed credit by itself does not prejudice Revenue. On that basis, denial of credit and consequential penalties were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>