<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 637 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221232</link>
    <description>A challenge to a penalty order on the ground of violation of natural justice failed because the record showed due service of notice, grant of time to object and be heard, and no timely response from the petitioner. The allegation that the order had been pre-dated and served after the objection was filed was not accepted on the available facts. No breach of natural justice was established, so interference with the penalty order was declined and the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:36:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 637 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221232</link>
      <description>A challenge to a penalty order on the ground of violation of natural justice failed because the record showed due service of notice, grant of time to object and be heard, and no timely response from the petitioner. The allegation that the order had been pre-dated and served after the objection was filed was not accepted on the available facts. No breach of natural justice was established, so interference with the penalty order was declined and the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>