<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 628 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221223</link>
    <description>The High Court Bombay dismissed appeals challenging the cancellation of reassessment proceedings initiated beyond the statutory four-year limit. The reassessment, based on a retrospective amendment to tax laws, was upheld by the court, ruling that such amendments do not imply failure to disclose material facts by the assessee. The appeals were dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:35:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 628 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221223</link>
      <description>The High Court Bombay dismissed appeals challenging the cancellation of reassessment proceedings initiated beyond the statutory four-year limit. The reassessment, based on a retrospective amendment to tax laws, was upheld by the court, ruling that such amendments do not imply failure to disclose material facts by the assessee. The appeals were dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>