<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 614 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221209</link>
    <description>Liability imposed on clubs under the Kerala Tax on Luxuries Act is cumulative rather than exclusive: payment of luxury tax by members under Section 4(2A) does not exempt the club from its separate liability under Section 4(2). The court followed earlier binding authority and rejected the contention that the special provision displaces the general levy. The challenge to the tax notices therefore failed, and the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 06:26:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 614 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221209</link>
      <description>Liability imposed on clubs under the Kerala Tax on Luxuries Act is cumulative rather than exclusive: payment of luxury tax by members under Section 4(2A) does not exempt the club from its separate liability under Section 4(2). The court followed earlier binding authority and rejected the contention that the special provision displaces the general levy. The challenge to the tax notices therefore failed, and the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>