<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 610 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221205</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery to the appellant in a case concerning service tax on toll collection rights under a BOT agreement with its subsidiary. The Tribunal found that the transaction potentially fell under the &#039;franchise&#039; category, subjecting it to service tax despite arguments based on the nature of toll collection as a non-taxable service. The Department&#039;s use of the extended period of limitation was upheld due to the appellant&#039;s lack of disclosure. Despite uncertainties in the applicability of service tax on toll collection, the appellant was directed to pre-deposit a specified amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 06:25:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 610 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221205</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery to the appellant in a case concerning service tax on toll collection rights under a BOT agreement with its subsidiary. The Tribunal found that the transaction potentially fell under the &#039;franchise&#039; category, subjecting it to service tax despite arguments based on the nature of toll collection as a non-taxable service. The Department&#039;s use of the extended period of limitation was upheld due to the appellant&#039;s lack of disclosure. Despite uncertainties in the applicability of service tax on toll collection, the appellant was directed to pre-deposit a specified amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>