<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 607 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221202</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, remanding certain issues back to the AO/TPO for reconsideration. It directed the AO to follow the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s decision on the computation of deduction under section 10A. The Tribunal stressed the importance of a consistent approach in selecting comparables and determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 607 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221202</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, remanding certain issues back to the AO/TPO for reconsideration. It directed the AO to follow the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s decision on the computation of deduction under section 10A. The Tribunal stressed the importance of a consistent approach in selecting comparables and determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>