<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 603 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221198</link>
    <description>An agreement for development of a printer solution was found to go beyond a mere supply of machinery because it granted exclusive ownership of foreground intellectual property, rights to pursue patent and design applications, and restrictions on the supplier&#039;s later use of the technology. On that basis, the associated payment was characterised as involving transfer of technology and technical know-how, bringing it within royalty and fees for technical services rather than simple goods consideration. The separate question of whether a lower withholding tax rate applied under section 115A(1)(b)(BB) was not examined below and was restored for limited reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 06:24:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 603 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221198</link>
      <description>An agreement for development of a printer solution was found to go beyond a mere supply of machinery because it granted exclusive ownership of foreground intellectual property, rights to pursue patent and design applications, and restrictions on the supplier&#039;s later use of the technology. On that basis, the associated payment was characterised as involving transfer of technology and technical know-how, bringing it within royalty and fees for technical services rather than simple goods consideration. The separate question of whether a lower withholding tax rate applied under section 115A(1)(b)(BB) was not examined below and was restored for limited reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>