https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221192 The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's grounds regarding the rejection of the deduction claim under section 80HHC on DEPB value and upheld the CIT(A)'s reliance on the Bombay High Court's judgment. However, the issue of charging interest under section 234D was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. en-us Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221192 The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's grounds regarding the rejection of the deduction claim under section 80HHC on DEPB value and upheld the CIT(A)'s reliance on the Bombay High Court's judgment. However, the issue of charging interest under section 234D was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221192