<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 593 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221188</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application to condone a 100-day delay in filing an appeal, caused by an employee&#039;s negligence. The appellant failed to provide evidence of disciplinary action against the negligent employee, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and stay petition. The Tribunal held that employee negligence does not meet the standard of sufficient cause for condoning appeal filing delays.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 06:22:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 593 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221188</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application to condone a 100-day delay in filing an appeal, caused by an employee&#039;s negligence. The appellant failed to provide evidence of disciplinary action against the negligent employee, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and stay petition. The Tribunal held that employee negligence does not meet the standard of sufficient cause for condoning appeal filing delays.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>