<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 588 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221183</link>
    <description>At the stay stage, the appellate authority&#039;s condition requiring payment of one-third of the penalty was examined only for prima facie case and proportionality, while challenges based on natural justice and alleged non-compliance with earlier directions were left to the pending appeals. Because the authority had already found a prima facie case, the remaining issue was whether the recovery condition was unduly onerous. The condition was found excessive in light of the total penalty liability across the relevant years and was modified to one-fourth of the amount payable, subject to which stay of recovery was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 07:42:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 588 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221183</link>
      <description>At the stay stage, the appellate authority&#039;s condition requiring payment of one-third of the penalty was examined only for prima facie case and proportionality, while challenges based on natural justice and alleged non-compliance with earlier directions were left to the pending appeals. Because the authority had already found a prima facie case, the remaining issue was whether the recovery condition was unduly onerous. The condition was found excessive in light of the total penalty liability across the relevant years and was modified to one-fourth of the amount payable, subject to which stay of recovery was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>