<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 568 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221163</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed that the rebate claim by the respondents be kept pending until the resolution of the appeal against the impugned order, which had granted a stay order waiving the pre-deposit. The Tribunal found that the show cause notice focused on denying wrongly availed credit for bought-out items not included in the finished goods&#039; assessable value. The decision ensures a fair consideration of the rebate claim in alignment with the pending appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 07:40:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 568 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221163</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed that the rebate claim by the respondents be kept pending until the resolution of the appeal against the impugned order, which had granted a stay order waiving the pre-deposit. The Tribunal found that the show cause notice focused on denying wrongly availed credit for bought-out items not included in the finished goods&#039; assessable value. The decision ensures a fair consideration of the rebate claim in alignment with the pending appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>