<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 560 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221155</link>
    <description>The Commissioner ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that constructions for Pondicherry University and Police Department were not taxable under &quot;Construction of Complex service&quot; due to personal use exemption. Additionally, the demand for construction for BSNL under &quot;Commercial or Industrial construction&quot; service was deemed unsustainable as the appellant had already paid tax under &quot;Works Contract&quot; service. Penalties were set aside as the appellant paid the remaining demand with interest before the show cause notice. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:11:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 560 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221155</link>
      <description>The Commissioner ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that constructions for Pondicherry University and Police Department were not taxable under &quot;Construction of Complex service&quot; due to personal use exemption. Additionally, the demand for construction for BSNL under &quot;Commercial or Industrial construction&quot; service was deemed unsustainable as the appellant had already paid tax under &quot;Works Contract&quot; service. Penalties were set aside as the appellant paid the remaining demand with interest before the show cause notice. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>