https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221135 The Tribunal confirmed a demand of Rs. 53,19,377 against the main applicant for clandestine removal of goods, imposing fines and penalties. The applicants' arguments regarding excess consumption of steel wire rods and rutile were not sustained, leading to a partial pre-deposit of Rs. 20 lakhs. Upon compliance, the balance amount of duty, fines, and penalties would be waived, with recovery stayed during the appeal process. The judgment addressed concerns about document availability due to the death of a consultant, emphasizing the importance of providing relied upon documents for defense. en-us Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:09:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221135 The Tribunal confirmed a demand of Rs. 53,19,377 against the main applicant for clandestine removal of goods, imposing fines and penalties. The applicants' arguments regarding excess consumption of steel wire rods and rutile were not sustained, leading to a partial pre-deposit of Rs. 20 lakhs. Upon compliance, the balance amount of duty, fines, and penalties would be waived, with recovery stayed during the appeal process. The judgment addressed concerns about document availability due to the death of a consultant, emphasizing the importance of providing relied upon documents for defense. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221135