https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221110 The appellants sought waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery after their appeals were dismissed for non-compliance with predeposit requirements. The Tribunal, considering a similar earlier case, directed predeposit of 50% of the duty amount for the company. Failure to comply led to a specific predeposit order by the Commissioner (Appeals). However, the Managing Director and Director were exempted from predeposit. The appeals were allowed for remand, emphasizing a fair hearing for all parties involved. en-us Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Feb 2013 06:59:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221110 The appellants sought waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery after their appeals were dismissed for non-compliance with predeposit requirements. The Tribunal, considering a similar earlier case, directed predeposit of 50% of the duty amount for the company. Failure to comply led to a specific predeposit order by the Commissioner (Appeals). However, the Managing Director and Director were exempted from predeposit. The appeals were allowed for remand, emphasizing a fair hearing for all parties involved. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221110