https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221106 The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's application for rectification of mistake in the final order and rejected the appeal. The decision was based on the interpretation of Rule 2(P) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and the application of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the ABB Ltd. case. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the utilization of cenvat credit for service tax liability on GTA services for the period in question, leading to the disposal of the cross objection. en-us Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221106 The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's application for rectification of mistake in the final order and rejected the appeal. The decision was based on the interpretation of Rule 2(P) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and the application of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the ABB Ltd. case. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the utilization of cenvat credit for service tax liability on GTA services for the period in question, leading to the disposal of the cross objection. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221106