<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 508 - High Court of Bombay</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221103</link>
    <description>The High Court granted a complete waiver for one demand and required a 20% deposit for another, based on the applicability of the exemption notification and the timing of the demands. The Court clarified that its observations were for the stay application purpose and would not impact the final appeal&#039;s merits. The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 508 - High Court of Bombay</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221103</link>
      <description>The High Court granted a complete waiver for one demand and required a 20% deposit for another, based on the applicability of the exemption notification and the timing of the demands. The Court clarified that its observations were for the stay application purpose and would not impact the final appeal&#039;s merits. The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>