<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 489 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221084</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and stay applications, waiving the pre-deposit requirement for duty, interest, and penalty in the case involving the manufacture of sugar and molasses. The demand for duty on the clearance of bagasse was dismissed as the appellant&#039;s use of common inputs for dutiable and exempted goods was deemed impractical to separate. The Tribunal found the lack of specific mention of inputs in the impugned order, setting it aside in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 489 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221084</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and stay applications, waiving the pre-deposit requirement for duty, interest, and penalty in the case involving the manufacture of sugar and molasses. The demand for duty on the clearance of bagasse was dismissed as the appellant&#039;s use of common inputs for dutiable and exempted goods was deemed impractical to separate. The Tribunal found the lack of specific mention of inputs in the impugned order, setting it aside in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>