<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 473 - Andhra Pradesh High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221068</link>
    <description>The Court concurred with the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and dismissing the appeals. The Court emphasized the importance of the assessee&#039;s bona fides in penalty proceedings, considering the assessee&#039;s compliance with Explanation 5 and lack of contumacious behavior. Relying on the principle of strict construction in penalty cases, the Court rejected the penalty imposition by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:42:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 473 - Andhra Pradesh High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221068</link>
      <description>The Court concurred with the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and dismissing the appeals. The Court emphasized the importance of the assessee&#039;s bona fides in penalty proceedings, considering the assessee&#039;s compliance with Explanation 5 and lack of contumacious behavior. Relying on the principle of strict construction in penalty cases, the Court rejected the penalty imposition by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>