<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 470 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221065</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI waived the pre-deposit of penalty for merchant exporters accused of colluding with a supplier in falsifying central excise invoices and documents for duty evasion. The Tribunal found a lack of concrete evidence supporting the collusion allegations and stayed the recovery of the penalty, emphasizing the necessity of substantial evidence in cases of duty evasion and collusion to ensure fair treatment for the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 470 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221065</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI waived the pre-deposit of penalty for merchant exporters accused of colluding with a supplier in falsifying central excise invoices and documents for duty evasion. The Tribunal found a lack of concrete evidence supporting the collusion allegations and stayed the recovery of the penalty, emphasizing the necessity of substantial evidence in cases of duty evasion and collusion to ensure fair treatment for the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>