<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 459 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221054</link>
    <description>The appellant, facing a Service Tax demand for a specific period, argued that the debited CENVAT Credit should be considered as payment towards the dues. The Commissioner (Appeals) accepted this argument, directing that the amount paid by the appellant be considered as payment, granting consequential relief. The appellant was instructed to pay the interest amount within 15 days, followed by settling the service tax, penalty, and interest within 30 days of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 06:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 459 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221054</link>
      <description>The appellant, facing a Service Tax demand for a specific period, argued that the debited CENVAT Credit should be considered as payment towards the dues. The Commissioner (Appeals) accepted this argument, directing that the amount paid by the appellant be considered as payment, granting consequential relief. The appellant was instructed to pay the interest amount within 15 days, followed by settling the service tax, penalty, and interest within 30 days of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>