https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221020 The appellant's appeals for assessment years 2003-04 and 2005-06 were dismissed, while the appeal for assessment year 2008-09 was partly allowed for statistical purposes, specifically regarding the disallowance under Section 14A. The Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment, exclusion of DEPB credit entitlement, disallowance of 80-IA deduction, expenditure for MRF Pace Foundation, and amortization of lease charges. However, the issue of disallowance under Section 14A was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration. en-us Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Feb 2013 07:36:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221020 The appellant's appeals for assessment years 2003-04 and 2005-06 were dismissed, while the appeal for assessment year 2008-09 was partly allowed for statistical purposes, specifically regarding the disallowance under Section 14A. The Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment, exclusion of DEPB credit entitlement, disallowance of 80-IA deduction, expenditure for MRF Pace Foundation, and amortization of lease charges. However, the issue of disallowance under Section 14A was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221020