<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 411 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221006</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the need for timely payment of service tax and interest to avoid penalties under the Finance Act 1994. The appellant&#039;s reliance on a precedent stating that no penalty should be imposed if service tax and interest are paid before the notice was upheld. The judgment aligned with the High Court&#039;s ruling in a similar case, leading to the dismissal of the penalty imposed by the authorities. The explanation added to Section 73(3) of the Finance Act 1994 further supported the appellant&#039;s position, resulting in the appeal being allowed and the impugned order set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 06:53:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 411 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221006</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the need for timely payment of service tax and interest to avoid penalties under the Finance Act 1994. The appellant&#039;s reliance on a precedent stating that no penalty should be imposed if service tax and interest are paid before the notice was upheld. The judgment aligned with the High Court&#039;s ruling in a similar case, leading to the dismissal of the penalty imposed by the authorities. The explanation added to Section 73(3) of the Finance Act 1994 further supported the appellant&#039;s position, resulting in the appeal being allowed and the impugned order set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>