<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 410 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221005</link>
    <description>Complete waiver of pre-deposit was refused because the appellant&#039;s prima facie case on manufacture was not accepted, though the Tribunal noted possible availability of the exemption notification, prior Tribunal precedent, the amount already deposited, and financial hardship. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 2,00,000 within six weeks; on compliance, the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery stayed until disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 06:53:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 410 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221005</link>
      <description>Complete waiver of pre-deposit was refused because the appellant&#039;s prima facie case on manufacture was not accepted, though the Tribunal noted possible availability of the exemption notification, prior Tribunal precedent, the amount already deposited, and financial hardship. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 2,00,000 within six weeks; on compliance, the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery stayed until disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>