<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 395 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220990</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order that rejected the appellant&#039;s claim for interest on a refund amount. Relying on a previous case involving the same assessee, the Tribunal found the issue to be identical and supported the appellant&#039;s contention based on a Supreme Court decision. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to interest on the delayed refund amount, in accordance with Section 11BB of the Act, and granted the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 06:50:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 395 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220990</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order that rejected the appellant&#039;s claim for interest on a refund amount. Relying on a previous case involving the same assessee, the Tribunal found the issue to be identical and supported the appellant&#039;s contention based on a Supreme Court decision. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to interest on the delayed refund amount, in accordance with Section 11BB of the Act, and granted the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>