<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 389 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220984</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the first appellate authority&#039;s dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement. The case involved the interpretation of Notification No.8/2003-CE regarding BIS certification for submersible pump sets. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the merits of the case and remanded the matter for reconsideration without requiring further deposits, ensuring both parties have a fair opportunity to present their arguments. The judgment focused on the correct interpretation of the notification and adherence to principles of natural justice, directing a reconsideration of the appeals on merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 06:48:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 389 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220984</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the first appellate authority&#039;s dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement. The case involved the interpretation of Notification No.8/2003-CE regarding BIS certification for submersible pump sets. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the merits of the case and remanded the matter for reconsideration without requiring further deposits, ensuring both parties have a fair opportunity to present their arguments. The judgment focused on the correct interpretation of the notification and adherence to principles of natural justice, directing a reconsideration of the appeals on merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>