<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 383 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220978</link>
    <description>Refund claims under Notification No. 17/2009-ST were rejected for non-production of original bills, challans or invoices evidencing service tax payment, but the dispute was treated as a rectifiable factual defect rather than a final bar. As there was no dispute about receipt of services for export of goods and the original documents could be produced for verification, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration. The adjudicating authority was directed to verify the documents and decide afresh in compliance with natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 383 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220978</link>
      <description>Refund claims under Notification No. 17/2009-ST were rejected for non-production of original bills, challans or invoices evidencing service tax payment, but the dispute was treated as a rectifiable factual defect rather than a final bar. As there was no dispute about receipt of services for export of goods and the original documents could be produced for verification, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration. The adjudicating authority was directed to verify the documents and decide afresh in compliance with natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>