<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 381 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220976</link>
    <description>Adequate infrastructure, staffing, recruitment, training and computerisation of DRTs and DRATs were treated as necessary for effective tribunal administration, and the reform directions were upheld for expeditious implementation. Section 18 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 was read as not excluding constitutional supervision, and Article 227 was held to preserve High Courts&#039; superintendence over the administrative functioning of DRTs and DRATs within their territorial jurisdiction. The tribunal reform measures and the High Courts&#039; supervisory role were both affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 381 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220976</link>
      <description>Adequate infrastructure, staffing, recruitment, training and computerisation of DRTs and DRATs were treated as necessary for effective tribunal administration, and the reform directions were upheld for expeditious implementation. Section 18 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 was read as not excluding constitutional supervision, and Article 227 was held to preserve High Courts&#039; superintendence over the administrative functioning of DRTs and DRATs within their territorial jurisdiction. The tribunal reform measures and the High Courts&#039; supervisory role were both affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>