<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 377 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220972</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s order regarding the disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the CIT(A)&#039;s order became inoperative once the matter was referred back to the Assessing Officer for re-computation. Regarding the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remitted the matter to the AO for a fresh decision on the penalty, aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s principle that penalty should correspond to the quantum computation. The revenue&#039;s appeal against the penalty was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 377 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220972</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s order regarding the disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the CIT(A)&#039;s order became inoperative once the matter was referred back to the Assessing Officer for re-computation. Regarding the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remitted the matter to the AO for a fresh decision on the penalty, aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s principle that penalty should correspond to the quantum computation. The revenue&#039;s appeal against the penalty was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>