https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220965 The court upheld respondent No.1's authority to introduce the global e-tender system and its clauses to safeguard commercial interests. It ruled that the petitioners lacked standing to challenge the terms meant for buyers, dismissing allegations of forum shopping. Emphasizing limited judicial review in tender matters, the court found respondent No.1's actions lawful and declined to intervene. The petition challenging the e-tender system was dismissed, with costs left to each party. en-us Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220965 The court upheld respondent No.1's authority to introduce the global e-tender system and its clauses to safeguard commercial interests. It ruled that the petitioners lacked standing to challenge the terms meant for buyers, dismissing allegations of forum shopping. Emphasizing limited judicial review in tender matters, the court found respondent No.1's actions lawful and declined to intervene. The petition challenging the e-tender system was dismissed, with costs left to each party. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220965