https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220938 A petition under Section 482 CrPC was treated as an improper route to challenge PMLA proceedings because the special statute provided a complete appellate hierarchy, including appeal to the Appellate Tribunal and further appeal to the High Court; the challenge had to proceed through those remedies. The 150-day objection to provisional attachment under Section 5 was also rejected, as delay caused by court proceedings and an undertaking before the court was excluded from the statutory period on the principle that an act of the court should prejudice no one. The attachment challenge therefore failed, with liberty preserved to pursue the statutory remedies. en-us Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Nov 2016 15:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220938 A petition under Section 482 CrPC was treated as an improper route to challenge PMLA proceedings because the special statute provided a complete appellate hierarchy, including appeal to the Appellate Tribunal and further appeal to the High Court; the challenge had to proceed through those remedies. The 150-day objection to provisional attachment under Section 5 was also rejected, as delay caused by court proceedings and an undertaking before the court was excluded from the statutory period on the principle that an act of the court should prejudice no one. The attachment challenge therefore failed, with liberty preserved to pursue the statutory remedies. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220938