<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 337 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220932</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the demand for reversal of CENVAT Credit on inputs sent for job work due to process loss, citing precedents and legal principles. The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that the demand was unsustainable and aligning with established legal precedents. The decision provided clarity on the treatment of process losses in excisable goods manufacturing, granting relief to the appellant based on judicial findings and legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 15:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 337 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220932</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the demand for reversal of CENVAT Credit on inputs sent for job work due to process loss, citing precedents and legal principles. The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that the demand was unsustainable and aligning with established legal precedents. The decision provided clarity on the treatment of process losses in excisable goods manufacturing, granting relief to the appellant based on judicial findings and legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>