https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220930 The appeal challenged the denial of CENVAT credit, demand of interest, and penalty. The appellant failed to comply with the directive to deposit 50% of the amount under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, resulting in appeal dismissal. The CENVAT credit on materials was found ineligible under the CENVAT Credit Rules. The appellate authority's decision for pre-deposit was upheld, but the appellant was given another chance to comply. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal allowed on remand with a directive to pre-deposit 50% of the disputed credit within six weeks. Compliance was required for further proceedings. en-us Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Feb 2013 06:56:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220930 The appeal challenged the denial of CENVAT credit, demand of interest, and penalty. The appellant failed to comply with the directive to deposit 50% of the amount under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, resulting in appeal dismissal. The CENVAT credit on materials was found ineligible under the CENVAT Credit Rules. The appellate authority's decision for pre-deposit was upheld, but the appellant was given another chance to comply. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal allowed on remand with a directive to pre-deposit 50% of the disputed credit within six weeks. Compliance was required for further proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220930