<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 333 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220928</link>
    <description>Central excise duty could not be imposed on bagasse, as an earlier Division Bench had already held that bagasse is not dutiable and that the demand based on circulars and notice could not be sustained. That settled position left no open legal question for reconsideration, and there was no basis to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 16:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 333 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220928</link>
      <description>Central excise duty could not be imposed on bagasse, as an earlier Division Bench had already held that bagasse is not dutiable and that the demand based on circulars and notice could not be sustained. That settled position left no open legal question for reconsideration, and there was no basis to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>