<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 329 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220924</link>
    <description>The Commissioner allowed the appeals, granting the appellants the denied refund of the service tax paid on foreign commission for exports made under Drawback Shipping bills. The appellants were found eligible for the refund under Notification No. 41/2007, as the condition regarding availing drawback under the relevant rules was omitted by an amended Notification in 2008. The commission paid to foreign agents was not considered an input service, and the refund amount was determined based on whether the claims were filed before or after the amendment date, with a restriction of 2% or 10% of the FOB value, respectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 06:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 329 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220924</link>
      <description>The Commissioner allowed the appeals, granting the appellants the denied refund of the service tax paid on foreign commission for exports made under Drawback Shipping bills. The appellants were found eligible for the refund under Notification No. 41/2007, as the condition regarding availing drawback under the relevant rules was omitted by an amended Notification in 2008. The commission paid to foreign agents was not considered an input service, and the refund amount was determined based on whether the claims were filed before or after the amendment date, with a restriction of 2% or 10% of the FOB value, respectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>