<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 326 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220921</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, directing the Tax Recovery Officer to release the immovable property from attachment following the Tribunal&#039;s decision, which resulted in a nil tax liability for the petitioner. The court emphasized that when the tax demand is reduced to nil, the Tax Recovery Officer must cancel the certificate and release the attached property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 326 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220921</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, directing the Tax Recovery Officer to release the immovable property from attachment following the Tribunal&#039;s decision, which resulted in a nil tax liability for the petitioner. The court emphasized that when the tax demand is reduced to nil, the Tax Recovery Officer must cancel the certificate and release the attached property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>