<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 320 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220915</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decisions of the Appellate Authority and the Tribunal, ruling that the appellant was not entitled to deductions under Section 80IB and 80IC due to the late filing of the return. The court emphasized that the due date specified under Section 139(1) of the Indian Income Tax Act was not extended by Section 139(4), highlighting the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and denying the appellant&#039;s claim for deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 320 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220915</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decisions of the Appellate Authority and the Tribunal, ruling that the appellant was not entitled to deductions under Section 80IB and 80IC due to the late filing of the return. The court emphasized that the due date specified under Section 139(1) of the Indian Income Tax Act was not extended by Section 139(4), highlighting the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and denying the appellant&#039;s claim for deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>