<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 318 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220913</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, finding the reopening of the assessment invalid. The petitioner, a non-resident company, had fully disclosed all material facts, and the credit for Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) was correctly allowed. The court held that there was no justification for reopening the assessment, leading to the writ petition being allowed with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 06:13:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 318 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220913</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, finding the reopening of the assessment invalid. The petitioner, a non-resident company, had fully disclosed all material facts, and the credit for Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) was correctly allowed. The court held that there was no justification for reopening the assessment, leading to the writ petition being allowed with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>