<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 310 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220905</link>
    <description>Job-work clearances made under Notification No. 214/86-CE were treated as prima facie eligible for waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery where no omission or commission was attributable to the appellant. The demand arose from an allegation that the supplier had no factory capable of manufacturing the final product, but the appellate findings indicated that any deficiency, if any, lay at the supplier&#039;s end and not with the appellant. On that basis, the tribunal found a prima facie case against insisting on immediate deposit and granted waiver of predeposit with stay of recovery pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 15:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 310 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220905</link>
      <description>Job-work clearances made under Notification No. 214/86-CE were treated as prima facie eligible for waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery where no omission or commission was attributable to the appellant. The demand arose from an allegation that the supplier had no factory capable of manufacturing the final product, but the appellate findings indicated that any deficiency, if any, lay at the supplier&#039;s end and not with the appellant. On that basis, the tribunal found a prima facie case against insisting on immediate deposit and granted waiver of predeposit with stay of recovery pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>