<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 305 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220900</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee regarding the deduction under section 80HHE of the Income-tax Act. However, the court ruled in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue on the classification of expenditure on building repairs as revenue rather than capital. Additionally, the court held that contributions made to the traffic police were not deductible under section 37 of the Act. The High Court allowed certain appeals, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s orders in some instances but confirming them on other aspects.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 305 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220900</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee regarding the deduction under section 80HHE of the Income-tax Act. However, the court ruled in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue on the classification of expenditure on building repairs as revenue rather than capital. Additionally, the court held that contributions made to the traffic police were not deductible under section 37 of the Act. The High Court allowed certain appeals, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s orders in some instances but confirming them on other aspects.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>