<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 285 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220880</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the decision of the Apex Reward Committee to reject the claim for a reward by the Petitioners, emphasizing that the grant of rewards to informers is discretionary and falls within the purview of competent authorities. The judgment highlighted that courts cannot interfere in such matters and reiterated that they cannot substitute their views for those of the authority evaluating informer claims. The Court found that the rejection of the reward claim was based on valid reasons and not arbitrary, leading to the dismissal of the petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 285 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220880</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the decision of the Apex Reward Committee to reject the claim for a reward by the Petitioners, emphasizing that the grant of rewards to informers is discretionary and falls within the purview of competent authorities. The judgment highlighted that courts cannot interfere in such matters and reiterated that they cannot substitute their views for those of the authority evaluating informer claims. The Court found that the rejection of the reward claim was based on valid reasons and not arbitrary, leading to the dismissal of the petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>